There are 6 types of string concatenations: In an experiment, it has been proved that string.Concat() is the best way to approach if the words are less than 1000(approximately) and if the words are more than 1000 then StringBuilder should be used. What performance issues each option brings? Can I still have hopes for an offer as a software developer. 2023 edit: With Java 16 came records where the compiler does the hard work automatically under the covers. :). How to concatenate strings in Java - Educative Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! I'm trying to understand what the best practice is and why for concatenating string literals and variables for different cases. If you can't make any kind of guess about the size, you're probably writing a utility function which should have its own optional argument for controlling pre-allocation. It's also important to point it out that you should use the + operator if you are concatenating string literals. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. It can be clumsy syntax. Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. testConcatenation5stringsConcat : 0.9 |||||||||||||||||||||| testConcatenation5stringsSB : 0.43, Interestingly, StringJoiner isn't mentioned here. If you concat multiple (more than two) Strings in one line, use + or StringBuilder.append, it doesn't matter, since the compiler converts + to StringBuilder.append. If multiple strings need to be concatenated, use StringBuilder. @Stephen, yes, it doesn't work if any of the strings is null. Browse other questions tagged, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide, The future of collective knowledge sharing. With Streams, you can satisfy this by mapping the objects to a string before the collection phase. What's the difference between strcpy and stpcpy? strings. Concatenating Strings in Java 9 - DZone What is truly the fastest way to concatenate strings in Java? Usually a separator has to be inserted between the strings, eg. The Java language provides special support for the string The default StringBuilder constructor reserves 16 Characters in the current implementation - at least on my machine. 1 String baseDirectory = "baseDir"; 2 String subFolder = "subFolder"; 3 String fileName = "fileName"; 4 5 List<String> filePathParts = Arrays.asList(baseDirectory, subFolder, fileName); What is the best and fastest way to concatenate strings. Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! I tried both codes none of those given same result what they got. Most of the time StringBuilder is your best bet, but there are cases as shown in that post that you should at least think about each situation. Non-definability of graph 3-colorability in first-order logic. 587), The Overflow #185: The hardest part of software is requirements, Starting the Prompt Design Site: A New Home in our Stack Exchange Neighborhood, Temporary policy: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) is banned, Testing native, sponsored banner ads on Stack Overflow (starting July 6). You didn't state what your criteria was. Should StringBuilder.append() be always preferred than concatenation? Not the answer you're looking for? Seems based on benchmarks at JSPerf that using += is the fastest method, though not necessarily in every browser. Yes I can get this from the article but it saves me one click. Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. Java Strings Concatenation For instance, if I have code like this. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. I've been recommending the use of string.format over string + string for years to people I've worked with. (Ep. You can also use the concat () method to concatenate two strings: Can you provide details on the JVM you tested these with? Is there a legal way for a country to gain territory from another through a referendum? If strings are known before hand and for some reasons multiple time same code needs to be run, use '+' as compiler will optimize and handle it during compile time itself. Example public class Test { public static void main(String args[]) { String st1 = "Hello"; String st2 = "How"; String st3 = "You"; String res = st1+st2+st3; System.out.println(res); } } Output How to Optimize String Concatenation in Java? - GeeksforGeeks In this tutorial, we'll dive into several of them as well as outline some common pitfalls and bad practices. Why free-market capitalism has became more associated to the right than to the left, to which it originally belonged? I was under the impression that StringBuffer is the fastest way to concatenate strings, but I saw this Stack Overflow post saying that concat() is the fastest method. 1. Assuming you have a char[fixed_size] as posted, rather than a char*, you can use a single, creative macro to do it all at once with a cout-like ordering rather than the disjointed printf style format. All I'm saying is that the underscores can be pre-filled. It allocates exactly as needed char[] and copies via. From Chinh Do - StringBuilder is not always faster: When concatenating three dynamic string values or less, use traditional string concatenation. Difference between "be no joke" and "no laughing matter", Typo in cover letter of the journal name where my manuscript is currently under review. Use + operator is best practice, it is also simple and readable. I've been looking for speed of string.format and now I see that it's little bit slow :-) I'll use concat instead. Don't microoptimize. Nonetheless, String.contact should be the fastest for 2 strings. afaik @ only turns off escape sequences processing. It really depends on your usage pattern. Is there a better way to concatenate multiple strings together in c other than having multiple calls to strcat() all in a row, like below? Can I improve this method of concatenation of strings? That would mean all java programs are having preformance issues. Joining very long lists os strings by naively addinging them from start to end is very slow: the padded buffer grows incrementally, and is reallocated again and again, making additional copies (and sollicitating a lot the garbage collector). Is there a different answer when one seeks the fastest way to concatenate two strings and when concatenating multiple strings? That could well be faster, since concatenating strings only to compute the hash of the concatenation seems wasteful. I have variations for IEnumerable